The cost of skipping research cover
Ambev brand card

Showcase

/

The cost of skipping research

ABOUT

Largest beer manufacturer in the world

INDUSTRY

Food & Beverage, Consumer Apps, Tech

OCCURRED IN

2018

KEY TAGS
UX ResearchProduct DesignMobile

The Cost of Skipping Research

A coupon app. A beverage giant. A redesign gone wrong.

What is Pedida de Hoje

A coupon-based app backed by a major beverage brand. Pick a bar, grab a coupon, show it to the waiter — simple in theory.

01

Download the app

Available on iOS and Android, free to install

02

Get the coupon

Choose your pedida and get a coupon

03

Show it to the waiter

Redeem at the bar and enjoy discount

The Challenge

The project shifted from a coupon app to a full bar guide, with three goals:

Local Pubs and Restaurants

Expanded visibility and measurable revenue growth

Digital App Users Community

More control, convenience, and tailored offers

Partner Beverage Company

Stronger market share and sustainable engagement

But the first mistake came early:

Mateus Garcia

Mateus Garcia

Product & Operational Leader

Company logo

We need to update fast — no time for UX studies

First mistake! 👈

The Process

The client pushed us to skip research and go straight to development. We shipped fast — but without validating a single user need.

Symbol

A fresh symbol to the new product vision

Places

Restaurants and bars searchable by location and deal

Preferences

Genre and beer type filters to personalize discovery

This satisfied the stakeholder. It didn't satisfy the users. Second mistake! 👈

What goes around comes around

Within a week, ratings dropped from 4 to 2 stars. Users weren't just disappointed — they were vocal.

before launch

Really useful for finding daily discounts. Saved me a lot of money

After launch

Used to love the coupons, now it's just a clunky restaurant finder

Our stakeholder called us saying:

Alexandra Stravisky

Alexandra Stravisky

Head of Digital Product

Company logo

Users are complaining a lot… what's going on?

Getting Back to Basics

We went to Fortaleza — home to 58% of our users — and talked to customers, bar owners, and field teams.

Bar owners

End users

Operational team

Three things surfaced immediately:

Waiter incentives

Tips (10% of bill) discouraged waiters from promoting the app, since coupons reduced their earnings

Waiter incentives

Price Gap

Real-world test: users saved 38% — 3 beers + snacks for R$28 vs. R$45.50 without the coupon

Price Gap

Manual validation

Paper coupons caused fraud, harming inventory, user experience, and reporting.

Manual validation

Deliverables

With research grounding our decisions, we shipped three key changes:

Coupon Authentication

Faster, fraud-proof validation for waiters at the point of sale

Consumption Awareness

Showed users how much they saved, making the app's value tangible

Results

After several iterations, the product recovered — both in numbers and in trust.

From 2★ to 4.2★

The redesign brought users back — ratings recovered, invites grew, and coupon generation climbed steadily through the year

Social invites boost

WhatsApp and Facebook sharing lifted invites by ~20%

Coupon growth

Coupon generation rose steadily Jan–Jul after the redesign

Rising sign-ups

New registrations grew throughout the year despite optional onboarding

Final Thoughts

Every shortcut has a cost. Here's what we learned the hard way:

Skipping research costs users

Nearly 1/3 churned — a direct result of shipping without validation

Going native doubled our workload

Native approach doubled our work. A hybrid app could have saved time and money

One person cannot wear every hat

Wearing PO and design hats simultaneously exposed real limits

No one delivers alone. This project was tough — but it shaped how I think about research, constraints, and long-term impact.